RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the progressive increase in age and associated chronic comorbidities and polypharmacy. However, assessments of the risk of emergency department (ED) revisiting published to date often neglect patients' pharmacotherapy plans, thus overseeing the Drug-related problems (DRP) risks associated with the therapy burden. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for ED revisit, hospital admission, and mortality based on patient's characteristics and pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients visited in the ED (triage 1, 2, or 3) of multiple hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) during 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of ED visits, hospital admission, or mortality 30 days after ED discharge. The study population was randomly split into a model development (60%) and validation (40%) datasets. The model included age, sex, income level, comorbidity burden, measured with the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), and number of medications. Forty-four medication groups, associated with medication-related health problems, were assessed using ATC codes. To assess the performance of the different variables, logistic regression was used to build multivariate models for ED revisits. The models were created using a "stepwise-forward" approach based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (AUCROC) curve for the primary endpoint was calculated. RESULTS: 851.649 patients were included; 134.560 (15.8%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge, 15.2% were hospitalized and 9.1% died within 30 days from discharge. Four factors (sex, age, GMA, and income level) and 30 ATC groups were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score. The model showed an AUCROC values of 0.720 (95%CI:0.718-0.721) in the development cohort and 0.719 (95%CI.0.717-0.721) in the validation cohort. Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk: 18.3%; intermediate risk: 40.0%; and high risk: 62.6%. CONCLUSION: The DICER score allows identifying patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days based on sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics, being a valuable tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción. Las infecciones urinarias (ITU) son un mo tivo frecuente de asistencia a los servicios de urgencias hospi talarias (SU), siendo cada vez más frecuente el aislamiento de cepas multirresistentes. El presente trabajo pretende evaluar el impacto de un programa multidisciplinar de optimización de antibioterapia en pacientes con ITU causada por bacterias mul tirresistentes atendidas desde el SU. Material y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de la puesta en marcha de un programa en el que participaron los servicios de urgencias, microbiología y farmacia. El tratamiento antibiótico de los pacientes que consultaron urgencias con urinocultivos positivos para bacterias multirresistentes fue revisado al alta por el equipo multidisciplinar. En aquellos pacientes con tra tamiento inapropiado se contactó con los médicos y/o farma céuticos del siguiente nivel asistencial o con los propios pa cientes en el caso de alta a domicilio. Se evaluó el impacto del programa sobre las nuevas consultas a urgencias a 30 días en comparación con los resultados obtenidos de la práctica habi tual en tres meses previos a la intervención. Resultados. Durante el año de implantación se revisaron 2.474 urinocultivos de pacientes con ITU, 537 (21,7%) causa das por bacterias multirresistentes. El tratamiento empírico al alta de urgencias fue inapropiado en 287 (53,4%) pacientes, realizando modificaciones del tratamiento en 232 de ellos. 73 pacientes (19,3%) reconsultaron el SU a los 30 días del alta, siendo este porcentaje inferior a los resultados obtenidos en los tres meses previos a la intervención (27,9%; p=0,031), sin encontrar diferencias significativas en el porcentaje de nuevas visitas asociadas a infecciones urinarias. Conclusión (AU)

Introduction. Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a fre quent reason for attendance at emergency department (ED). The present study evaluates the impact of a multidisciplinary program for the optimization of antibiotic therapy in patients with UTI caused by multi-drug resistant bacteria treated from the hospital ED. Material and methods. Descriptive study of the imple mentation of a program in which emergency, microbiology and pharmacy departments participated. Antibiotic treatment of the patients who consulted the ED with positive urine cul tures caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria was reviewed up on discharge. In those patients with inappropriate treatment, doctors and/or pharmacists of the next level of healthcare or patients in the case of home discharge were contacted. The impact of the program was evaluated based on new visits to the ED at 30 days after discharge, compared with the results obtained from the usual practice three months prior the in tervention. Results. During the first year, 2,474 urine cultures of pa tients with UTI were reviewed, 533 (21.7%) were caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Empirical treatment was inap propriate in 287 (53.4%), making treatment modifications in 243 of them. 73 (19.3%) patients returned to the ED 30 days after discharge, being lower than the results obtained in the three months prior intervention (27.9%; p=0.031), without significant differences in new visits associated with UTI. Conclusion. The implementation of a multidisciplinary program focused on multidrug resistant UTI at discharge form ED correct antibiotic therapy in a large number of patients, be ing a potentially tool to reduce the number of new ED visits (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frailty assessment allows the identification of patients at risk of death. The aim here was to study the ability of Frail-VIG Index (FI-VIG) in order to discriminate frailty groups of older adults and garner its correlation with mortality in an Emergency-Department Short-Stay Unit (ED-SSU). METHODS: Our observational, single-center, prospective study consecutively included patients over 65-years-old admitted between March 1, 2021, and April 30, 2021. RESULTS: 302 patients were included (56 % women), mean age 83 ± 8 years, and 39.1 % of them had a functional disability whilst 16.5 % of them had dementia. A total of 174 patients (58 %) met the frailty criteria (FI-VIG ≥ 0.2): 111 (63.8 %) had mild frailty (FI-VIG 0.2-0.36), 52 (29.9 %) had moderate frailty (FI-VIG 0.36-0.55), and 11 (6.3 %) had advanced frailty (FI-VIG > 0.55). Mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year was analyzed: no frailty was 6.3 %, 10.8 %, and 12.5 %, respectively; mild frailty was 10.8 %, 22.5 %, and 22.5 %, respectively; moderate frailty was 25 %, 34.6 %, and 42.3 %, respectively; advanced frailty was 36.4 %, 54.5 %, and 3.6 %, respectively. This shows the significant differences between the groups (1-year mortality p < 0.001). Mild frailty vs. non-frail HR was 2.47 (95 %CI 1.12-5.46), moderate frailty vs. non-frail HR was 6.93 (95 %CI 3.16-15.23), and advanced frailty vs. non-frail HR was 11.29 (95 %CI 3.54-36.03). The mean test time was 7 min. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between frailty degree and mortality at 1, 6, and 12 months. FI-VIG is fast and easy-to-use in this setting. It is routine implementation in ED-SSUs could enable early risk stratification.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced. RESULTS: The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced. CONCLUSION: The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.

OBJETIVO: Desarrollar un conjunto de actividades e indicadores de atención farmacéutica en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios mediante un consenso colectivo de un panel de expertos que permita priorizar las actividades a realizar por los farmacéuticos en estas unidades. METODO: Un comité formado por miembros de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) y de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) evaluó una propuesta inicial de actividades e indicadores potenciales, basados en la evidencia científica disponible, en formato de cuestionario. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos del panel clasificó de forma individual la relevancia de cada una de las actividades propuestas en cuatro dimensiones: evidencia científica, impacto en la respuesta clínica y seguridad para el paciente, facilidad de implementación y grado de prioridad. La segunda ronda se realizó mediante una reunión grupal de forma virtual, a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas, así como los comentarios vertidos por los participantes del panel de forma anónima. En esta ronda, cada actividad fue clasificada por consenso como básica, intermedia o avanzada en función del grado de prioridad de implantación considerado por el grupo de expertos. RESULTADOS: Se propusieron un total de 26 potenciales actividades a los expertos, con indicadores asociados. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, no se eliminó ninguna de las actividades propuestas. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron 25 actividades, de las cuales se puntuaron 9 como actividades básicas, 10 actividades como intermedias y 6 actividades como avanzadas. CONCLUSIONES: El desarrollo del conjunto de actividades e indicadores de atención farmacéutica en urgencias, priorizados por grado de relevancia para la unidad, es la base para el desarrollo de esta cartera de servicios en los hospitales españoles, y sirve como guía tanto para farmacéuticos como para gestores, médicos y enfermeros de la unidad a fin de mejorar la farmacoterapia los pacientes atendidos en los servicios de urgencias.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) due to multidrug-resistant bacteria are a frequent reason for visiting the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a predictive model of infection by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in UTIs treated in an ED. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. Adult patients admitted to an ED with a diagnosis of UTI and positive urine culture were included. The main objective was to evaluate the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC), the scale proposed by González-del-Castillo, considering infection by a resistant pathogen as the dependent variable and the scale score of the predictive model used as the independent variable. RESULTS: The study included 414 patients with UTIs, 125 (30.2%) of which were caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. A total of 38.4% of patients were treated with antibiotics during the previous 3 months and a multidrug-resistant pathogen was isolated from 10.4% of the total during the previous 6 months. The AUC-ROC of the scale for predicting UTIs due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83), the optimal cut-off point being 9 points, with a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 71.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the predictive model evaluated is a useful tool in real clinical practice to improve the success of empirical treatment of patients presenting to the ED with a diagnosis of UTI and positive urine culture pending identification.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivos: Evaluar la utilidad de una herramienta basada en los códigos diagnósticos CIE-10 para identificar a los pacientes que consultan a un servicio de urgencias por acontecimientos adversos por medicamentos (AAM). Métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo, en el cual se incluyeron los pacientes que acudieron a un servicio de urgencias durante el periodo de mayo-agosto de 2022 con un diagnóstico codificado con alguno de los 27 diagnósticos CIE-10 establecidos como alertantes para el estudio. La confirmación de la presencia de AAM a partir de dichos diagnósticos se realizó analizando los fármacos prescritos previamente al ingreso, a través de un debate entre expertos y mediante una entrevista telefónica con los pacientes. Resultados: Se evaluaron 1.143 pacientes con diagnósticos alertantes, de los cuales 310 (27,1%) correspondieron a pacientes cuya consulta se atribuyó a un AAM. El 58,4% de los AAM se detectaron mediante 3 códigos diagnósticos: K59.0-Estreñimiento (n = 87; 28,1%), I16.9-Crisis hipertensiva (n = 72; 23,2%) e I95.1-Hipotensión ortostática (n = 22; 7,1%). Los códigos diagnósticos con mayor grado de asociación con AAM fueron: E16.2-Hipoglucemia no especificada (73,7%) y E11.65-Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 con hiperglucemia (71,4%), mientras que los diagnósticos D62-Anemia poshemorrágica aguda e I74.3-Embolia y trombosis de arterias de los miembros inferiores no identificaron ningún AAM. Conclusiones: Los códigos CIE-10 asociados a diagnósticos alertantes son una herramienta de utilidad para identificar a los pacientes que consultan los servicios de urgencias por AAM y podrían ser utilizados para abordar las intervenciones de prevención secundaria dirigidas a evitar nuevas consultas al sistema sanitario. (AU)

Objectives: To assess the usefulness of a tool based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patients who consult an emergency department for adverse drug events (ADE). Methods: Prospective observational study, in which patients discharged from an emergency department during May to August 2022 with a diagnosis coded with one of the 27 ICD-10 diagnoses considered as triggers were included. ADE confirmation was carried out by analyzing drugs prescribed prior to admission, and through a discussion among experts and a phone interview with patients after hospital discharge. Results: 1,143 patients with trigger diagnoses were evaluated, of which 310 (27.1%) corresponded to patients whose emergency visit was attributed to an ADE. A 58.4% of ADE consultations were found with three diagnostic codes: K59.0-Constipation (n = 87; 28.1%), I16.9-Hypertensive Crisis (n = 72; 23.2%) and I95.1-Orthostatic hypotension (n = 22; 7.1%). The diagnoses with the highest degree of association with consultations attributed to ADE were E16.2-Hypoglycemia, unspecified (73.7%) and E11.65-Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (71.4%), while diagnoses D62-Acute posthemorrhagic anemia and I74.3-Embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower limbs were not attributed to any case of ADE. Conclusions: The ICD-10 codes associated with trigger diagnoses are a useful tool to identify patients who consult the emergency services with ADE and could be used to apply secondary prevention programs to avoid new consultations to the health care system. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of a tool based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patients who consult an emergency department for adverse drug events (ADE). METHODS: Prospective observational study, in which patients discharged from an emergency department during May to August 2022 with a diagnosis coded with one of the 27 ICD-10 diagnoses considered as triggers were included. ADE confirmation was carried out by analyzing drugs prescribed prior to admission, and through a discussion among experts and a phone interview with patients after hospital discharge. RESULTS: 1143 patients with trigger diagnoses were evaluated, of which 310 (27.1%) corresponded to patients whose emergency visit was attributed to an ADE. A 58.4% of ADE consultations were found with three diagnostic codes: K59.0-Constipation (n = 87; 28.1%), I16.9-Hypertensive Crisis (n = 72; 23.2%) and I95.1-Orthostatic hypotension (n = 22; 7.1%). The diagnoses with the highest degree of association with consultations attributed to ADE were E16.2-Hypoglycemia, unspecified (73.7%) and E11.65-Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (71.4%), while diagnoses D62-Acute posthemorrhagic anemia and I74.3-Embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower limbs were not attributed to any case of ADE. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10 codes associated with trigger diagnoses are a useful tool to identify patients who consult the emergency services with ADE and could be used to apply secondary prevention programs to avoid new consultations to the health care system.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Time between Emergency Department (ED) and ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) activation time is a good indicator of ED quality. STEMI delays are of particular importance in some subgroups, such as women and the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of sex and age with activation time in STEMI patients admitted to the ED. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted including all patients admitted to the ED activated as a STEMI. The main variable was activation time. To evaluate the independent predictors of activation time, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out, variables were sex, age, sex and age combined, chest pain, ST elevation in the electrocardiogram, and first medical contact (FMC) at the hospital's ED. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were included. They were classified by sex: 23.9% (78) women and 76.1% (249) men; and age: 51.1% (167) <65 yo and 48.9% (160) ≥65 yo. Women and elderly patients exhibited a more atypical presentation. Multivariate analysis shows that showed that elderly age (OR=1.976 95%; CI=1.257-3.104; p = 0.003) and FMC prior to attending the ED (OR=1.762; 95% CI=1.117-2.779; p = 0.015) were associated with a longer activation time. Women older than 65 years old showed the longest activation time. CONCLUSION: STEMI delays are longer in women and the elderly with atypical presentation. Age ≥65 and FMC outside the ED were associated with an increase in the activation time. This highlights the need to develop strategies to improve activation time for these specific patient groups.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Evaluar la frecuencia y los factores asociados con la mortalidad a corto plazo de personas que viven en residencias tras ingreso en urgencias.Método: Análisis retrospectivo multicéntrico de una muestra aleatoria de admisiones de personas $ 65 años que viven en residencias en cinco servicios de urgencias de Cataluña, a lo largo de 2017. Se analizaron características sociodemográficas, el estado funcional y cognitivo previo, multimorbilidad, nivel de triaje de las urgencias, duración de la estancia en urgencias, hospitalización y mortalidad a corto plazo (en urgencias o en los 30 días posteriores al alta). Se utilizó un análisis de regresión multivariante para investigar los factores asociados con la mortalidad a corto plazo. Resultados: Se analizaron 2.444 admisiones en urgencias, con una edad media de 85,9 (DE 7,1) años, 67,7% mujeres. La mortalidad a corto plazo (15,5%) se asoció con una edad > 90 años (OR 1,50; IC 95%: 1,5-1,95), un índice de Charlson > 2 (OR 1,47; IC 95%: 1,14-1,90), y un grado de dependencia moderado (OR 1,50; IC 95%: 1,03-2,20) y grave (OR 2,56; IC 95%: 1,84-3,55). También se asoció con un mayor nivel de triaje de la urgencia, duración de la estancia en urgencias e ingreso en planta de hospitalización. Conclusiones: Los ancianos residentes con las características descritas podrían beneficiarse especialmente de intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención de traslados potencialmente innecesarios a urgencias y a la implementación de una atención integral geriátrica dentro de los servicios de urgencias, a fin de garantizar una buena calidad de los cuidados en fases finales de la vida. (AU)

Objectives: To evaluate short-term mortality in people transferred from aged care homes for treatment in a hospital emergency department (ED) and to analyze factors associated with mortality. Methods: Multicenter study of a random sample of retrospective data of patients treated in 5 EDs in Catalonia in 2017. The patients were over the age of 65 years and lived in residential care facilities. In addition to short-term mortality (in the ED or within 30 days of discharge), we analyzed sociodemographic characteristics, prior functional and cognitive status, multimorbidity, triage level on arrival, length of stay in the ED, and hospital admission. Odds ratios (ORs) for factors associated with short-term mortality were calculated by multivariate regression analysis. Results: A total of 2444 ED admissions were analyzed. The patients’ mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.1) years, and 67.7% were women. Short-term mortality (in 15.5%) was associated with age >90 years (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.5-1.95 years), a Charlson index >2 (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90), and dependency assessed as moderate (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.03-2.20) or severe (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.84-3.55). Other associated factors were a higher level of urgency on triage, duration of ED stay, and hospital admission. Conclusions: Aged residents with the characteristics associated with short-term mortality could benefit from interventions for potentially avoiding unnecessary transfers to an ED, and from the implementation of comprehensive geriatric care within the ED. This could be useful to support good quality of care at the end of life. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced sleepiness is a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits for frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of anticholinergic burden on 90-day revisitation risk for frail patients who visit the ED due to drug-induced sleepiness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in which patients treated at a fragility care area of an ED who sought consultation for drug-associated sleepiness from June 2020 to June 2021 were included. To evaluate the 90-day revisitation risk factors, a multivariate analysis was performed, including those factors with a p<0.200 from a previous univariate model. A Cox regression model was performed to assess the impact of a high burden on the time until 90-day ED revisitation. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight patients were included (mean age 80.7±12.3 years). The median number of drugs that patients were currently on at emergency admission was eight (range 2-19), while at hospital discharge it was nine (range 2-20), with the median number of central nervous system (CNS) depressant drugs on admission being three (range 1-6). Thirty-five (23.6%) patients revisited the ED 90 days after discharge for sleepiness or agitation. In the multivariate model, a significant association was observed between a high anticholinergic burden during treatment at discharge (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.36 to 9.71), chronic kidney disease (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.81), and the risk of 90-day revisitation. Patients with high anticholinergic burden had a shorter time to revisit than those with medium or low anticholinergic burden (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.99). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pharmacological sleepiness and a high anticholinergic burden in their chronic treatment carry a greater risk of revisitation to EDs, and should be considered candidates for specific interventions after visiting these units.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the probability of reaching an adequate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pK/pD) index for different cefepime dosages in frail patients with bacteremia treated in the emergency room. METHODS: Simulation study based on Gram-negative bacterial strains that cause bacteremia. The probability of reaching a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at 50% and 100% dosing intervals (fT > 50 and fT > 80% MIC) was assessed for two different renal clearance intervals. RESULTS: One hundred twenty nine strains were collected, the predominant species being Escherichia coli (n = 83 [64.3%]). In patients with a ClCr of 30 mL/min, an fT > 50% MIC was reached in more than 90% of the simulations. However, a dose of at least 1 g every 12 h must be administered to reach an fT > 80% MIC. In patients with a ClCr of 30-60 mL/min, the probability of reaching an fT > 50% MIC was higher than 90% with doses of 1 g every 8 h or more, but this value was not reached in > 90% simulations for any of the doses tested in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cefepime dosing can reach an adequate PK/PD index in frail patients. Nevertheless, a high dose or extended infusion is necessary to reach an fT > 80% MIC in patients with a ClCr > 60 mL/min.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate short-term mortality in people transferred from aged care homes for treatment in a hospital emergency department (ED) and to analyze factors associated with mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter study of a random sample of retrospective data of patients treated in 5 EDs in Catalonia in 2017. The patients were over the age of 65 years and lived in residential care facilities. In addition to short-term mortality (in the ED or within 30 days of discharge), we analyzed sociodemographic characteristics, prior functional and cognitive status, multimorbidity, triage level on arrival, length of stay in the ED, and hospital admission. Odds ratios (ORs) for factors associated with short-term mortality were calculated by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2444 ED admissions were analyzed. The patients' mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.1) years, and 67.7% .were women. Short-term mortality (in 15.5%) was associated with age >90 years (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.5-1.95 years), a Charlson index >2 (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90), and dependency assessed as moderate (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.03- 2.20) or severe (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.84-3.55). Other associated factors were a higher level of urgency on triage, duration of ED stay, and hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Aged residents with the characteristics associated with short-term mortality could benefit from interventions for potentially avoiding unnecessary transfers to an ED, and from the implementation of comprehensive geriatric care within the ED. This could be useful to support good quality of care at the end of life.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la frecuencia y los factores asociados con la mortalidad a corto plazo de personas que viven en residencias tras ingreso en urgencias. METODO: Análisis retrospectivo multicéntrico de una muestra aleatoria de admisiones de personas $ 65 años que viven en residencias en cinco servicios de urgencias de Cataluña, a lo largo de 2017. Se analizaron características sociodemográficas, el estado funcional y cognitivo previo, multimorbilidad, nivel de triaje de las urgencias, duración de la estancia en urgencias, hospitalización y mortalidad a corto plazo (en urgencias o en los 30 días posteriores al alta). Se utilizó un análisis de regresión multivariante para investigar los factores asociados con la mortalidad a corto plazo. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 2.444 admisiones en urgencias, con una edad media de 85,9 (DE 7,1) años, 67,7% mujeres. La mortalidad a corto plazo (15,5%) se asoció con una edad > 90 años (OR 1,50; IC 95%: 1,5-1,95), un índice de Charlson > 2 (OR 1,47; IC 95%: 1,14-1,90), y un grado de dependencia moderado (OR 1,50; IC 95%: 1,03-2,20) y grave (OR 2,56; IC 95%: 1,84-3,55). También se asoció con un mayor nivel de triaje de la urgencia, duración de la estancia en urgencias e ingreso en planta de hospitalización. CONCLUSIONES: Los ancianos residentes con las características descritas podrían beneficiarse especialmente de intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención de traslados potencialmente innecesarios a urgencias y a la implementación de una atención integral geriátrica dentro de los servicios de urgencias, a fin de garantizar una buena calidad de los cuidados en fases finales de la vida.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a frequent reason for emergency departments (EDs) visits. However, data about the risk factors associated with EDs revisits are limited. Objective: To develop and validate a predictive model indicating the risk factors associated with EDs revisit within 30 days of the first visit. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who attended an ED for DRPs related to cardiovascular drugs. A 30-day prediction model was created in a derivation cohort by logistic regression. An integer score proportional to the regression coefficient was assigned to the variables with P < .100 in the multivariate analysis. Results: 581 patients (mean age: 80.0 [12.6] years) were included, 133 (22.9%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge. Six factors (chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, visit to an ED in the preceding 3 months, high anticholinergic burden, DRPs associated with heparin, and safety-related DRPs) were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score, termed the DREAMER score. The model reached an area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.77) in the referral cohort and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.65-0.74) in the validation cohort (P = .273). Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk (0-8 points): 11.6%; intermediate risk (9-14 points): 21.3%; and high risk (>14 points): 41.2%. Conclusion and Relevance: The DREAMER score identifies patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days from the first visit for a DRPs, being a useful tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.